Osteotomy Techniques in Preservation Rhinoplasty with an Analysis of a Radix-Skull Base Computed Tomography Series.

This study aims to explain our experience with dorsal preservation osteotomies, focusing on transverse, lateral, and dorsal aesthetic lines (DAL) osteotomies. We describe the utilization of a variety of surgical instruments, including osteotomes, saws, burrs, and piezo. This paper describes our concept of transcutaneous ultrasonic osteotomy, microedged-specific osteotomy, applying drills for lateral wall reshaping, and integrating piezo technology to establish new DAL. Furthermore, we present a radix-skull base computed tomography series analysis to evaluate the safety of transverse and radix osteotomies.

Patient-specific cranioplasty, by direct and indirect additive manufacturing of biopolymers and implantable materials.

BACKGROUND: Autologous bones are traditionally used in surgical reconstruction of skullcap. Since patients' bones are often unavailable or cause of infections, implantable synthetic materials emerged as promising alternative. These can be shaped by different technologies, while 3D printing offers remarkable chances in terms of flexibility, accuracy, cost-saving and customizability. METHODS: This study aims to evaluate strengths and limitations of the three main strategies that imply additive manufacturing for the implementation of cranial prosthesis: (i) direct printing of PLA (polylactic acid) skullcaps, mould casting of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) prosthesis using (ii) silicone mould manufactured from a 3D printed master, (iii) 3Dprinted TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) mould. RESULTS: All solutions achieved good geometric accuracy and excellent mechanical resistance. Direct printing of the PLA resulted in the fastest strategy, followed by PMMA casting in a silicone mould. CONCLUSIONS: The use of silicone was overall more advantageous, due to lower costs and the possibility of sterilization by using autoclaving.

Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusopathies: a Radiological Classification.

Purpose: Before implant surgery, a preoperative radiological evaluation is recommended for recognizing maxillary inflammatory conditions. In order to avoid a failure of the dental procedure and prevent medical-legal consequences, it is necessary to treat patients suffering of maxillary sinus pathologies. The classification proposed in our study aims to standardize the reference values for mucosal thickening and to verify their association with the odontogenic or disventilatory causes of sinus pathology. Methods: The maximum mucosal thickness was measured at the level of the maxillary sinus floor: mucosal thickness was present when greater than 1 mm and was classified according to its extension within the sinus cavity. Results: Imaging data of 270 adult patients were included, performed for dental diagnosis and treatment planning, and they were divided into four main classes: Class I (85 pt.), mucosal thickness lesser than 2 mm, not pathological. Class II A (52 pt.), mucosal thickness between 2 and 5 mm, localized to the maxillary sinus floor: it is still considered non-pathological, and a "wait-and-see" approach is recommended. Class II B (46 pt.), mucosal thickness greater than 5 mm but localized at sinus floor: pathological mucosa with odontogenic etiology, requiring dental treatment. Class III A (39 pt.), mucosa thicker than 5 mm and concentric, most likely due to sinus ventilation disfunction: it requires maxillary antrostomy. Class III B (30 pt.), sinonasal manifestations such as nasal polyposis, retention cysts, mucocele, dental foreign body: pathological mucosa to be treated with ESS. Class IV (12 pt.), oroantral fistula: nasal endoscopic or oral approach. Conclusions: Our classification intends to suggest the better therapeutic option, in case of sinus pathology, according to the entity and pathogenesis of the mucosal thickening, in order to reduce complication and failure rate of dental surgery.

Nasal Tip Rotation by Exclusive Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Deep Medial Ligament Management: An Objective Evaluation.

The nasal tip constitutes the mobile portion of the nose, in direct contraposition to the pyramid that is a fixed structure. Its configuration, position, and shape are derived mainly from the outline and from the thickness of the wing cartilages, important elements of the nasal tip, that together with skin and subcutaneous tissue can deeply influence the configuration and dynamics of this section of the nose as well. In reshaping the nasal tip, 2 fundamental concepts must be considered: projection and rotation; these may be modified, acting on the nasal cartilaginous framework and/or on the superficial nasal fibromuscular structure (SMAS). The aims of this study are to evaluate the nasal tip changes in terms of rotation and projection obtained just acting on superficial muscle aponeurotic deep medial layer without performing any dissection or modification of the nasal tip framework, and to try to explain these possible changes according to the SMAS structure rearrangements only. Twenty-one patients (18 female and 3 male) were subjected to closed rhinoplasty, without tip cartilage dissection/modification. Preoperative and postoperative tip rotation angle, nasolabial angle, and tip projection were measured. The only tip procedure performed was the resection of the SMAS deep medial layer. Our results show significant rotation of the nasal tip and no statistically significant tip deprojection.

Does the removal of retained staples really improve postoperative chronic sequelae after transanal stapled operations?

BACKGROUND: Transanal stapled procedures are increasingly being used. Several postoperative complications can be referred to their application, including those related to the presence of retained staples at the level of the staple line. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess whether the removal of the retained staples is a useful approach to improve some of the most common postoperative complications of these surgical techniques. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the One-Day Surgery Unit of St. Andrea Hospital. PATIENTS: All of the patients who underwent a stapled transanal procedure from January 2003 to December 2011 were included in the study. Patients included in the study were followed postoperatively for 1 year after surgery to identify the presence of retained staples. INTERVENTIONS: If identified, the retained staples were removed endoscopically or transanally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After the staple removal, patients were followed with biweekly office visit for 2 months to evaluate the progression of symptoms. RESULTS: From the 566 patients included in the study, 165 experienced postoperative complications, and in 66 of these cases, retained staples were found and removed. With the removal of retained staples, symptoms were almost all resolved or improved. In only 1 case did the retained staples removal not modify the symptoms. LIMITATIONS: The study design may have introduced potential selection bias. In addition, the study was limited by the lack of a specific questionnaire for the evaluation of symptoms improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The removal of the retained staples is an efficacious and safe procedure to solve or improve postoperative complications and should be always considered.

Can a curved stapler made for open surgery be useful in laparoscopic lower rectal resections? Technique and experience of a single centre.

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy to perform lower anterior rectal resection is increasing worldwide because it allows better visualisation and rectal mobilisation and also reduces postoperative pain and recovery. The Contour Curved Stapler (CCS) is a very helpful device because of its curved profile that enables better access into the pelvic cavity and allows rectal closure and section to be performed in one shot. In this paper, we present an original technique to use this device, made for open surgery, in laparoscopy and the results of our experience. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the data of all patients who underwent lower laparoscopic anterior rectal resection and in which the CCS was used to perform section of the rectum between September 2005 and September 2011. To perform section of the rectum a Lapdisc(®) was inserted through a 6-7 cm supra-pubic midline incision to allow placement of the CCS into the pelvic cavity. Patients' biographical and surgical data such as sex, age, indication for surgery, infection, anastomotic leakage or stenosis and staple-line bleeding were prospectively collected in a computerised database and evaluated. RESULTS: Between September 2005 and September 2011, we performed 45 laparoscopic lower rectal resection using CCS, 27 male and 18 female with a mean age of 61 years (range 40-82 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.5 kg/m(2) (range 16.5-35 kg/m(2)). In 29 cases a temporary ileostomy was performed. Mean operative time was 131 min (range 97-210 min). In all cases it was possible to perform a lower section of the rectum with CCS. No intraoperative or postoperative staple line bleeding occurred. In two patients we observed anastomotic leaks and in one of these a temporary ileostomy was performed. None of the patients showed an anastomotic stenosis at 1-year follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that CCS enables section of the lower rectum to be easily performed, especially in adverse anatomical condition, and the technique proposed by us allows the use of this stapler without giving up the benefits of laparoscopic access.